Manchester City have warned they could pursue legal action after claims by Real Madrid presidential candidate Enrique Riquelme that striker Erling Haaland could join the Spanish giants if he wins the club’s upcoming election.
Speaking during a televised appearance on June 3, Riquelme alleged that Haaland has a release clause in his contract with Manchester City and suggested the Norwegian forward would be open to a move to Madrid under his leadership. He also claimed interest in Spain international Rodri, another key figure at City.
Manchester City swiftly dismissed the remarks, categorically denying the existence of any such clause or the possibility of a transfer. In a strongly worded response, the club warned it would take legal steps to protect the image and contractual integrity of its players.
“The statements are entirely false and misleading,” a City spokesperson said. “We will not hesitate to act against any misuse of our players’ names or reputations.”
Haaland’s representatives also moved to distance the striker from the claims, describing the comments as “entertainment rather than reality.” The 23-year-old remains under a long-term contract at City and has been central to the club’s domestic and European success since his arrival.
The controversy comes just days before Real Madrid members head to the polls on June 7, in a contest that has drawn attention for its bold promises and high-profile rhetoric. Riquelme’s comments echo a long-standing tradition in Spanish football politics, where candidates often pledge marquee signings to win support.
Incumbent president Florentino Pérez, widely seen as the frontrunner, responded indirectly by emphasizing continuity and stability. He reiterated his commitment to retaining top talents, including Kylian Mbappé, and hinted at a potential managerial surprise involving José Mourinho.
While such election campaigns have historically featured ambitious recruitment claims, Manchester City’s reaction signals a firmer stance against what it views as unfounded speculation involving contracted players.
With tensions rising ahead of the vote, the episode underscores the intersection of football politics and global transfer intrigue, where statements made on the campaign trail can carry consequences far beyond the ballot box.